Off Center

Call Routing on the Edge

2/16/2012

0 Comments

 
Many progressive contact centers are starting to break free from the confines and rigidity of traditional call routing. Rather than blindly sending callers to the next available agent – regardless of who’s calling or why – these centers are exploring routing methods that are so unconventional they have been banned in certain Midwestern U.S. cities.

Here are a few prime examples of customer care organizations doing call routing on the edge.

HMOno Health Insurance
HMOno uses priority queuing like no other contact center on earth or in New Mexico. The center’s New Policy division gives high priority to healthy callers because they cost less to insure and whine less to agents. 

Every call is front-ended by an IVR system designed to determine if new callers have any serious health risks. A voice prompt asks callers a series of risk assessment questions, such as “Do you smoke?” “Do you drink?” and “Do you work at a public high school?” Callers who answer “no” to all risk assessment questions are quickly routed to a live agent anxious to sell them a policy. Callers who answer “yes” to one or two assessment questions are knocked back a few places in the queue. Those who answer “yes” to three or four questions are placed at the end of the queue. And those who answer “yes” to five or more questions are immediately routed to a company competitor or a hospital.

The IVR system also has been programmed to listen for any sneezing, coughing or wheezing sounds to help determine a caller’s health. If any such sounds are detected, a voice prompt says “Gesundheit!” or “Please cover your mouth” before the caller is bumped back in the queue or routed externally.


MegaMerchandise
MegaMerchandise, which sells everything from saucepans to sporting goods, knows customers appreciate the personal touch. That’s why their contact center – staffed with an eclectic group of employees – uses a truly unique routing process that matches each caller with an agent who has similar interests, personality traits, and SAT scores.

All calls are initially answered by an automated “matchmaker” programmed to quickly assess which agent the caller is most likely to bond with. For instance, if a man from Brooklyn calls interested in purchasing a baseball bat or a thick gold chain, the matchmaker will route that call to an agent like Joey “No-Neck” Gambini. Joey can then have a friendly informal chat with the caller about benchpressing and broken kneecaps to help build rapport before closing the near-certain sale.


Big Spur Bank & Mistrust
Handling irate customers is never fun, but routing them to convicted murderers can be. Big Spur Bank & Mistrust – based in Sweetwater, Texas – has been doing it for about a year, with impressive results.

The bank’s contact center uses cutting-edge technology to identify angry callers, who are then seamlessly routed to death row inmates trained to help the callers realize the pettiness of their complaints.

Here’s how it works: The center’s automated attendant is able to measure the heart rate of each caller. Whenever the rate exceeds 200 beats per minute, the attendant knows that the caller is either furious or has just run a 10K race. To determine which is the case, the caller is told to “Press 1 if you are fighting mad” or to “Press 2 if you need some Gatorade.” Callers who press 1 are routed to the first available killer in one of the many fine high-security prisons in Texas. To help callers put things in perspective, Inmate agents use phrases like, “How dare you complain to me about a $3 ATM fee – I sleep on a metal slab and eat gruel every day,” or “You think being rejected for a loan is bad? Try having your stay of execution request denied 10 times.”

In most cases, callers calm down and apologize for their selfishness, at which point the inmate agent can take advantage of the caller’s guilt and begin cross-selling/up-selling premium bank products.



0 Comments

Bad Ideas in Customer Care

6/9/2011

18 Comments

 
I’m only 42, but I have the mind of an 80 year-old. It’s not that I easily forget things or enjoy shuffleboard or easily forget things; it’s that I’m cranky and crotchety well beyond my years. Where I used to be playfully irreverent and relatively good-natured, I now simply complain at the drop of a hat. In fact, I get really aggravated when somebody drops a hat.

In other words, I’m no fun to be around. But I am fun to read on occasion – especially if you are a call center or customer service professional who’s been forced to keep quiet about bothersome things in the industry and your job. Customer care folk are expected to be forever positive and optimistic and cheerful and accommodating. And many of you truly are, which is why we rarely hang out.

Call centers and customer service are evolving and improving in a lot of ways, but I didn’t come here to talk about that. I’d rather rant about some of the current bad ideas and troublesome trends in our field.


Personality-based call routing. This recent call center technology development is sort of like skills-based routing on steroids. And, as all of you who do not make your living as a football player, baseball player or professional cyclist know, steroids are bad.

The thinking behind personality-based routing is this: If a company can match each customer with an agent who shares similar traits and behaviors, positive experiences and increased loyalty (and sales) will result.  Sounds good in theory, but so did Windows Vista.

There are several inherent flaws with personality-based call routing:

1) Many customers, like myself, are obnoxious jerks, and when we call with a problem or complaint, we don’t want to speak to anybody even remotely like us. Give us a sweet and empathetic sap who will kiss our butts while we roar and rant -- not some fellow cranky smart-ass who’s going to try to steal our thunder.

2) Personality-based routing assumes that your agents all have a personality. I have called your company and happen to know for a fact that this isn’t the case. What this means is that, if you deploy personality-based routing, many of your employees will be sitting around doing nothing while the members of your staff who are even just the least bit interesting or annoying will be getting slammed with calls.

3) By matching up individuals who are highly compatible, you risk having your center’s Average Handle Time (AHT) go through the roof. Rather than efficiently handling strangers’ inquiries and issues, agents could very well fall in love with some of their callers – or vice versa – thus turning your ACD into a sort of call center Match.com apparatus that fosters intimate relationships rather than profitable ones. 

(For those of you who think I’m making personality-based routing up, you can read more about it here: http://bit.ly/9fYSYX -- but please return to my website or I’ll come looking for you)  


Video calls. I continue to hear talk about how video is going to take customer service by storm and greatly humanize the caller experience. Keep in mind most of that talk is coming from desperate vendors who over-invested in video-over-IP software back when they were hooked on illicit substances in the mid 1990s.  

There’s nothing wrong with the actual technology that drives video interactions; it’s been ready for prime time for years. The problem is that allowing callers to see the faces of employees whom you pay $8.50/hour and whom you cram into tiny cubicles is risky business. Your agents may be able to put a “smile in their voice”, but their attempts to force an actual smile onto a face that’s attached to a body that’s suffering from wrist, back and eye maladies can end up making them look like somebody punched them while they were sucking a lemon.       

Granted, there are a few call centers that have effectively implemented video calling, but most of them are located in Europe, where agents get four weeks of vacation and are encouraged to drink wine between calls. 
  

“Customer Effort” as a KPI. Is it important to gauge how easy it is for customers to do business with your organization and agents? Absolutely. But good luck precisely measuring that effort in any real quantifiable way. Fanatics of the latest metric craze – “Customer Effort” – would have you believe that you can accurately track not only whether each customer’s issue has been resolved or not, but also how many times each customer smashed their head against a wall or desk while awaiting such resolution.

I’m certainly not against the idea behind Customer Effort, but I can’t imagine how it could be a formal KPI in the call center. I suggest you forget trying to put a number to something so ambiguous and subjective. It’s best just to maintain a comprehensive quality monitoring program that incorporates C-Sat results into scores (“Voice of the Customer”), and then just assume if those scores are decent, you’re making things easy enough for most customers.

If, on the other hand, you discover that customers have started a Facebook hate-page dedicated to your organization and/or some of your agents, you need to either dramatically improve the service you provide or replace your existing customers with some who don’t mind putting in a little work to get what they need. Customers can be so lazy these days.


I look forward to your comments, as long as they are extremely positive and full of exaggerated praise. You’ve already seen what happens when I get cranky.  


18 Comments

LOOK INSIDE my book "Full Contact: Contact Center Practices and Strategies that Make an Impact".
Picture

Picture

Contact Center Tunes!
Song parodies to entertain your contact center troops. Click here to listen and download.

Picture
OK, so my wife put this picture up here, but actually it pretty much tells you all you need to know about me. 

Archives

January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010

Categories

All
4 X 10 Workweek
Abusive Callers
Acronyms
Agent Adherence
Agent Assessment
Agent Coaching
Agent Development
Agent Empowerment
Agent Engagement
Agent Engagement
Agent Hiring
Agent Motivation
Agent Recognition
Agent Reserve Teams
Agent Retention
Agent Retention
Agent Rewards
Agent Selection
Agent Training
Agent Turnover
Agent Turnover
Agent Wellness
Aht
Alternative Schedules
Benchmarking
Big Data
Business Continuity
Call Center
Call Center
Call Center Best Practices
Call Center Blog
Call Center Blog
Call Center Careers
Call Center Coaching
Call Center Conferences
Call Center Definitions
Call Center Disaster Recovery Plan
Call Center Ergonomics
Call Center Facility Design
Call Center Forecasting
Call Center Hiring
Call Center Humor
Call Center Limericks
Call Center Management
Call Center Metrics
Call Center News 2010
Call Center Poems
Call Center Poetry
Call Center Recruiting
Call Centers
Call Centers
Call Center Satire
Call Center Songs
Call Center Staffing
Call Center Staffing
Call Center Terms
Call Center Training
Call Center Trends
Call Center Turnover
Call Crisis
Call Routing
Chat
Coaching
Coaching And Feedback
Contact Center
Contact Center
Contact Center Benchmarking
Contact Center Best Practices
Contact Center Blog
Contact Center Blog
Contact Center Book
Contact Center Books
Contact Center Careers
Contact Center Challenges
Contact Center Channels
Contact Center Christmas
Contact Center Coaching
Contact Center Cost-cutting
Contact Center Evolution
Contact Center Evolution
Contact Center Expert
Contact Center Hiring
Contact Center Humor
Contact Center Management
Contact Center Metrics
Contact Center Rap
Contact Center Resolutions
Contact Center Resources
Contact Center Rules
Contact Centers
Contact Centers
Contact Center Satire
Contact Center Satire & Recognition
Contact Center Solutions
Contact Center Songs
Contact Center Staffing
Contact Center Survival
Contact Center Trends
Contingency Plan
Continuous Improvement
Corporate Social Responsibility
C Sat Measurement
C-Sat Measurement
Customer Care Predictions
Customer-centric Self-service
Customer Effort
Customer Experience
Customer Experience
Customer Experience Management
Customer Feedback
Customer Loyalty
Customer Satisfaction
Customer Satisfaction Measurement
Customer Satisfaction Surveys
Customer Service
Customer Service
Customer Service Blog
Customer Service Careers
Customer Service Recovery
Customer Service Week
Employee Engagement
Employee Engagement
Employee Satisfaction
Employee Satisfaction Surveys
E Sat
E-Sat
E-support Agents
First Call Resolution
First Contact Resolution
First-Contact Resolution
Forecast Accuracy
Forecasting
Happy Holidays
Home Agents
Humor
Ivr
Kpis
Managing Chat
Measuring Training Effectiveness
Metrics
Millennials In The Contact Center
Multichannel
Multichannel Call Center
Multichannel Customer Service
Multichannel Management
New-hire Training
On-boarding
Peer Mentoring
Personality-based Routing
Positive Feedback
Post-contact Surveys
Priority Queuing
Quality
Quality Assurance
Quality Monitoring
Quality Monitoring Forms
Remote Agents
Rewards And Recognition
Rewards & Recognition
Satire
Scheduling
Self Service
Self-service
Service Level
Service Recovery
Social Customer Care
Social Media
Social Media And The Call Center
Social Media In The Call Center
Social Media Monitoring
Speech Recognition
Staffing
Telecommute
Thanksgiving
The Contact Center
Transition Training
Turnover Reduction
Video Calls
Virtual Agents
Voc
Voice Of The Customer
Web Chat
Web Self Service
Web Self-service
Wfm
Work At Home
Work At Home Agents
Work-at-home Agents
Workforce Management